Mirrorless cameras
Which brand 5 AI models pick, with intervals.
Fast panel · Panel, equal weight
- anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5 @ claude-haiku-5.5 via OpenRouter (20%)
- openai/gpt-6-luna @ gpt-6-luna via OpenRouter (20%)
- google/gemini-4-argon @ gemini-4-argon via OpenRouter (20%)
- mistralai/mistral-large-4-0 @ mistral-large-4-0 via OpenRouter (20%)
- deepseek/deepseek-v4.1-flash @ deepseek-v4.1-flash via OpenRouter (20%)
Too closeNo single favourite: Canon, Fujifilm, Nikon, OM System, and Sony share the top tier for these 5 API models.
Tier 1
- Sony59%95% interval 47–70%plausible rank 1–5
- Fujifilm43%95% interval 32–54%plausible rank 1–6
- Canon41%95% interval 29–53%plausible rank 1–7
- Nikon35%95% interval 24–46%plausible rank 1–7
- OM System26%95% interval 16–38%plausible rank 1–8
Tier 2
- Panasonic18%95% interval 10–28%plausible rank 2–9
- Leica14%95% interval 6–24%plausible rank 3–10
- Hasselblad8%95% interval 2–16%plausible rank 5–10
- Blackmagic Design4%95% interval 1–11%plausible rank 7–10
- Sigma3%95% interval 0–8%plausible rank 6–10
Drag across the chart to probe a share.
Too closeNo single favourite: Canon, Fujifilm, Nikon, OM System, and Sony share the top tier for these 5 API models.
| Brand | Choice share | 95% interval | Plausible rank | Tier |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sony | 59% | 47–70% | 1–5 | Tier 1 |
| Fujifilm | 43% | 32–54% | 1–6 | Tier 1 |
| Canon | 41% | 29–53% | 1–7 | Tier 1 |
| Nikon | 35% | 24–46% | 1–7 | Tier 1 |
| OM System | 26% | 16–38% | 1–8 | Tier 1 |
| Panasonic | 18% | 10–28% | 2–9 | Tier 2 |
| Leica | 14% | 6–24% | 3–10 | Tier 2 |
| Hasselblad | 8% | 2–16% | 5–10 | Tier 2 |
| Blackmagic Design | 4% | 1–11% | 7–10 | Tier 2 |
| Sigma | 3% | 0–8% | 6–10 | Tier 2 |
How to read this
- Choice share: how often models pick a brand when it appears in a shortlist of 4. Chance is 25%, the dashed line.
- The band is the 95% interval; the bright tick is the estimate. Overlapping bands are not a strict order.
- Tiers are published: a tier groups brands not distinguishable from that tier's leader. Same tier does not mean equal.
- Rank shows the plausible rank range, not a strict place.
- Drag across the chart to probe a share and see which intervals contain it.
- Brand names only: the models saw each option as a brand name, with no product facts, and answered from their own knowledge.
- Fast panel: the fast or small current models of each vendor, not the full flagship panel.
- Beta: intervals are not yet small-sample calibrated.
- Each page shows the latest edition. Dates are in the downloadable JSON.
Panel and conditions
Each edition puts the brands of the category to a panel of AI models, called through their APIs, in randomized shortlists of 4 (chance is 25%). Each option was a brand name only, with no product facts, prices or any commercial data, so a brand's share measures which brand the models recommend from their own knowledge for the shopper needs of the scenarios. Shares come with 95% intervals; tiers and rank intervals are simultaneous at the same level.
- anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5 @ claude-haiku-5.5 via OpenRouter (20%)
- openai/gpt-6-luna @ gpt-6-luna via OpenRouter (20%)
- google/gemini-4-argon @ gemini-4-argon via OpenRouter (20%)
- mistralai/mistral-large-4-0 @ mistral-large-4-0 via OpenRouter (20%)
- deepseek/deepseek-v4.1-flash @ deepseek-v4.1-flash via OpenRouter (20%)
Conditions: closed-book API calls via OpenRouter (pinned providers); web search, grounding, tools and retrieval off; forced choice; 2 paraphrases per scenario in English.
Methodology: ACM-1.0-chart-draft (draft rules for movement, significance and events, awaiting review).