Video conferencing platforms
Which brand 5 AI models pick, with intervals.
Fast panel · Panel, equal weight
- anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5 @ claude-haiku-5.5 via OpenRouter (20%)
- openai/gpt-6-luna @ gpt-6-luna via OpenRouter (20%)
- google/gemini-4-argon @ gemini-4-argon via OpenRouter (20%)
- mistralai/mistral-large-4-0 @ mistral-large-4-0 via OpenRouter (20%)
- deepseek/deepseek-v4.1-flash @ deepseek-v4.1-flash via OpenRouter (20%)
ClearZoom stands alone in the top tier for these 5 API models.
Tier 1
- Zoom84%95% interval 74–91%plausible rank 1
Tier 2
- Google Meet44%95% interval 32–56%plausible rank 2–4
- Microsoft Teams43%95% interval 31–55%plausible rank 2–5
- Webex35%95% interval 24–48%plausible rank 2–5
Tier 3
- Whereby16%95% interval 7–28%plausible rank 3–10
- GoTo Meeting9%95% interval 4–16%plausible rank 5–10
- Dialpad Meetings7%95% interval 3–12%plausible rank 5–10
- RingCentral Video6%95% interval 1–14%plausible rank 5–10
- Zoho Meeting4%95% interval 1–11%plausible rank 5–10
- 8x8 Meet2%95% interval 0–7%plausible rank 5–10
Drag across the chart to probe a share.
Changes since the previous edition
The judge panel changed since the previous edition, so shares are not compared between the two.
- mistralai/mistral-large-4-0 @ mistral-large-4-0 via OpenRouter: same model, new judge settings
This note was added after publication from the published editions; the signed snapshot is unchanged. Corrections log
ClearZoom stands alone in the top tier for these 5 API models.
| Brand | Choice share | 95% interval | Plausible rank | Tier |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Zoom | 84% | 74–91% | 1 | Tier 1 |
| Google Meet | 44% | 32–56% | 2–4 | Tier 2 |
| Microsoft Teams | 43% | 31–55% | 2–5 | Tier 2 |
| Webex | 35% | 24–48% | 2–5 | Tier 2 |
| Whereby | 16% | 7–28% | 3–10 | Tier 3 |
| GoTo Meeting | 9% | 4–16% | 5–10 | Tier 3 |
| Dialpad Meetings | 7% | 3–12% | 5–10 | Tier 3 |
| RingCentral Video | 6% | 1–14% | 5–10 | Tier 3 |
| Zoho Meeting | 4% | 1–11% | 5–10 | Tier 3 |
| 8x8 Meet | 2% | 0–7% | 5–10 | Tier 3 |
How to read this
- Choice share: how often models pick a brand when it appears in a shortlist of 4. Chance is 25%, the dashed line.
- The band is the 95% interval; the bright tick is the estimate. Overlapping bands are not a strict order.
- Tiers are published: a tier groups brands not distinguishable from that tier's leader. Same tier does not mean equal.
- Rank shows the plausible rank range, not a strict place.
- Drag across the chart to probe a share and see which intervals contain it.
- Brand names only: the models saw each option as a brand name, with no product facts, and answered from their own knowledge.
- Fast panel: the fast or small current models of each vendor, not the full flagship panel.
- Each page shows the latest edition. Dates are in the downloadable JSON.
Panel and conditions
Each edition puts the brands of the category to a panel of AI models, called through their APIs, in randomized shortlists of 4 (chance is 25%). Each option was a brand name only, with no product facts, prices or any commercial data, so a brand's share measures which brand the models recommend from their own knowledge for the shopper needs of the scenarios. Shares come with 95% intervals; tiers and rank intervals are simultaneous at the same level.
- anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5 @ claude-haiku-5.5 via OpenRouter (20%)
- openai/gpt-6-luna @ gpt-6-luna via OpenRouter (20%)
- google/gemini-4-argon @ gemini-4-argon via OpenRouter (20%)
- mistralai/mistral-large-4-0 @ mistral-large-4-0 via OpenRouter (20%)
- deepseek/deepseek-v4.1-flash @ deepseek-v4.1-flash via OpenRouter (20%)
Conditions: closed-book API calls via OpenRouter (pinned providers); web search, grounding, tools and retrieval off; forced choice; 2 paraphrases per scenario in English.
Methodology: ACM-1.0-chart-draft (draft rules for movement, significance and events, awaiting review).