Video streaming services
Which brand 5 AI models pick, with intervals.
Fast panel · Panel, equal weight
- anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5 @ claude-haiku-5.5 via OpenRouter (20%)
- openai/gpt-6-luna @ gpt-6-luna via OpenRouter (20%)
- google/gemini-4-argon @ gemini-4-argon via OpenRouter (20%)
- mistralai/mistral-large-4-0 @ mistral-large-4-0 via OpenRouter (20%)
- deepseek/deepseek-v4.1-flash @ deepseek-v4.1-flash via OpenRouter (20%)
ClearNetflix stands alone in the top tier for these 5 API models.
Tier 1
- Netflix74%95% interval 62–84%plausible rank 1
Tier 2
- HBO Max41%95% interval 28–54%plausible rank 2–8
- Prime Video39%95% interval 26–52%plausible rank 2–8
- Hulu31%95% interval 20–42%plausible rank 2–8
- Disney+28%95% interval 16–41%plausible rank 2–8
- Paramount+23%95% interval 14–33%plausible rank 2–8
- Peacock16%95% interval 7–27%plausible rank 2–11
- Apple TV+15%95% interval 7–27%plausible rank 2–11
Tier 3
- AMC+3%95% interval 1–8%plausible rank 7–11
- MGM+3%95% interval 1–8%plausible rank 7–11
- STARZ3%95% interval 0–10%plausible rank 7–11
Drag across the chart to probe a share.
Changes since the previous edition
The judge panel changed since the previous edition, so shares are not compared between the two.
- mistralai/mistral-large-4-0 @ mistral-large-4-0 via OpenRouter: same model, new judge settings
- deepseek/deepseek-v4.1-flash @ deepseek-v4.1-flash via OpenRouter: added in this edition
This note was added after publication from the published editions; the signed snapshot is unchanged. Corrections log
ClearNetflix stands alone in the top tier for these 5 API models.
| Brand | Choice share | 95% interval | Plausible rank | Tier |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Netflix | 74% | 62–84% | 1 | Tier 1 |
| HBO Max | 41% | 28–54% | 2–8 | Tier 2 |
| Prime Video | 39% | 26–52% | 2–8 | Tier 2 |
| Hulu | 31% | 20–42% | 2–8 | Tier 2 |
| Disney+ | 28% | 16–41% | 2–8 | Tier 2 |
| Paramount+ | 23% | 14–33% | 2–8 | Tier 2 |
| Peacock | 16% | 7–27% | 2–11 | Tier 2 |
| Apple TV+ | 15% | 7–27% | 2–11 | Tier 2 |
| AMC+ | 3% | 1–8% | 7–11 | Tier 3 |
| MGM+ | 3% | 1–8% | 7–11 | Tier 3 |
| STARZ | 3% | 0–10% | 7–11 | Tier 3 |
How to read this
- Choice share: how often models pick a brand when it appears in a shortlist of 4. Chance is 25%, the dashed line.
- The band is the 95% interval; the bright tick is the estimate. Overlapping bands are not a strict order.
- Tiers are published: a tier groups brands not distinguishable from that tier's leader. Same tier does not mean equal.
- Rank shows the plausible rank range, not a strict place.
- Drag across the chart to probe a share and see which intervals contain it.
- Brand names only: the models saw each option as a brand name, with no product facts, and answered from their own knowledge.
- Fast panel: the fast or small current models of each vendor, not the full flagship panel.
- Each page shows the latest edition. Dates are in the downloadable JSON.
Panel and conditions
Each edition puts the brands of the category to a panel of AI models, called through their APIs, in randomized shortlists of 4 (chance is 25%). Each option was a brand name only, with no product facts, prices or any commercial data, so a brand's share measures which brand the models recommend from their own knowledge for the shopper needs of the scenarios. Shares come with 95% intervals; tiers and rank intervals are simultaneous at the same level.
- anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5 @ claude-haiku-5.5 via OpenRouter (20%)
- openai/gpt-6-luna @ gpt-6-luna via OpenRouter (20%)
- google/gemini-4-argon @ gemini-4-argon via OpenRouter (20%)
- mistralai/mistral-large-4-0 @ mistral-large-4-0 via OpenRouter (20%)
- deepseek/deepseek-v4.1-flash @ deepseek-v4.1-flash via OpenRouter (20%)
Conditions: closed-book API calls via OpenRouter (pinned providers); web search, grounding, tools and retrieval off; forced choice; 2 paraphrases per scenario in English.
Methodology: ACM-1.0-chart-draft (draft rules for movement, significance and events, awaiting review).