Cordless power tools
Which brand 5 AI models pick, with intervals.
Fast panel · Panel, equal weight
- anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5 @ claude-haiku-5.5 via OpenRouter (20%)
- openai/gpt-6-luna @ gpt-6-luna via OpenRouter (20%)
- google/gemini-4-argon @ gemini-4-argon via OpenRouter (20%)
- mistralai/mistral-large-4-0 @ mistral-large-4-0 via OpenRouter (20%)
- deepseek/deepseek-v4.1-flash @ deepseek-v4.1-flash via OpenRouter (20%)
Too closeNo single favourite: DEWALT, Makita, and Milwaukee share the top tier for these 5 API models.
Tier 1
- Milwaukee62%95% interval 49–74%plausible rank 1–3
- DEWALT56%95% interval 44–67%plausible rank 1–4
- Makita52%95% interval 37–67%plausible rank 1–6
Tier 2
- Bosch25%95% interval 15–38%plausible rank 2–11
- RYOBI21%95% interval 10–35%plausible rank 3–11
- RIDGID17%95% interval 8–28%plausible rank 3–11
- FLEX14%95% interval 8–24%plausible rank 4–11
- Metabo HPT13%95% interval 6–22%plausible rank 4–11
- CRAFTSMAN6%95% interval 0–18%plausible rank 4–11
- BLACK+DECKER4%95% interval 0–14%plausible rank 4–11
- SKIL3%95% interval 0–12%plausible rank 4–11
Drag across the chart to probe a share.
Too closeNo single favourite: DEWALT, Makita, and Milwaukee share the top tier for these 5 API models.
| Brand | Choice share | 95% interval | Plausible rank | Tier |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Milwaukee | 62% | 49–74% | 1–3 | Tier 1 |
| DEWALT | 56% | 44–67% | 1–4 | Tier 1 |
| Makita | 52% | 37–67% | 1–6 | Tier 1 |
| Bosch | 25% | 15–38% | 2–11 | Tier 2 |
| RYOBI | 21% | 10–35% | 3–11 | Tier 2 |
| RIDGID | 17% | 8–28% | 3–11 | Tier 2 |
| FLEX | 14% | 8–24% | 4–11 | Tier 2 |
| Metabo HPT | 13% | 6–22% | 4–11 | Tier 2 |
| CRAFTSMAN | 6% | 0–18% | 4–11 | Tier 2 |
| BLACK+DECKER | 4% | 0–14% | 4–11 | Tier 2 |
| SKIL | 3% | 0–12% | 4–11 | Tier 2 |
How to read this
- Choice share: how often models pick a brand when it appears in a shortlist of 4. Chance is 25%, the dashed line.
- The band is the 95% interval; the bright tick is the estimate. Overlapping bands are not a strict order.
- Tiers are published: a tier groups brands not distinguishable from that tier's leader. Same tier does not mean equal.
- Rank shows the plausible rank range, not a strict place.
- Drag across the chart to probe a share and see which intervals contain it.
- Brand names only: the models saw each option as a brand name, with no product facts, and answered from their own knowledge.
- Fast panel: the fast or small current models of each vendor, not the full flagship panel.
- Beta: intervals are not yet small-sample calibrated.
- Each page shows the latest edition. Dates are in the downloadable JSON.
Panel and conditions
Each edition puts the brands of the category to a panel of AI models, called through their APIs, in randomized shortlists of 4 (chance is 25%). Each option was a brand name only, with no product facts, prices or any commercial data, so a brand's share measures which brand the models recommend from their own knowledge for the shopper needs of the scenarios. Shares come with 95% intervals; tiers and rank intervals are simultaneous at the same level.
- anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5 @ claude-haiku-5.5 via OpenRouter (20%)
- openai/gpt-6-luna @ gpt-6-luna via OpenRouter (20%)
- google/gemini-4-argon @ gemini-4-argon via OpenRouter (20%)
- mistralai/mistral-large-4-0 @ mistral-large-4-0 via OpenRouter (20%)
- deepseek/deepseek-v4.1-flash @ deepseek-v4.1-flash via OpenRouter (20%)
Conditions: closed-book API calls via OpenRouter (pinned providers); web search, grounding, tools and retrieval off; forced choice; 2 paraphrases per scenario in English.
Methodology: ACM-1.0-chart-draft (draft rules for movement, significance and events, awaiting review).