Luggage
Which brand 5 AI models pick, with intervals.
Fast panel · Panel, equal weight
- anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5 @ claude-haiku-5.5 via OpenRouter (20%)
- openai/gpt-6-luna @ gpt-6-luna via OpenRouter (20%)
- google/gemini-4-argon @ gemini-4-argon via OpenRouter (20%)
- mistralai/mistral-large-4-0 @ mistral-large-4-0 via OpenRouter (20%)
- deepseek/deepseek-v4.1-flash @ deepseek-v4.1-flash via OpenRouter (20%)
Too closeNo single favourite: Briggs & Riley and Travelpro share the top tier for these 5 API models.
Tier 1
- Briggs & Riley62%95% interval 49–74%plausible rank 1–2
- Travelpro51%95% interval 39–63%plausible rank 1–5
Tier 2
- Samsonite31%95% interval 23–40%plausible rank 2–8
- Monos28%95% interval 18–40%plausible rank 2–10
- RIMOWA28%95% interval 20–38%plausible rank 2–9
- Away20%95% interval 13–30%plausible rank 3–11
- Delsey Paris17%95% interval 9–27%plausible rank 3–11
- Victorinox17%95% interval 9–26%plausible rank 3–11
Tier 3
- Calpak8%95% interval 3–16%plausible rank 5–11
- Beis8%95% interval 2–16%plausible rank 4–11
- SwissGear6%95% interval 1–15%plausible rank 6–11
Drag across the chart to probe a share.
Too closeNo single favourite: Briggs & Riley and Travelpro share the top tier for these 5 API models.
| Brand | Choice share | 95% interval | Plausible rank | Tier |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Briggs & Riley | 62% | 49–74% | 1–2 | Tier 1 |
| Travelpro | 51% | 39–63% | 1–5 | Tier 1 |
| Samsonite | 31% | 23–40% | 2–8 | Tier 2 |
| Monos | 28% | 18–40% | 2–10 | Tier 2 |
| RIMOWA | 28% | 20–38% | 2–9 | Tier 2 |
| Away | 20% | 13–30% | 3–11 | Tier 2 |
| Delsey Paris | 17% | 9–27% | 3–11 | Tier 2 |
| Victorinox | 17% | 9–26% | 3–11 | Tier 2 |
| Calpak | 8% | 3–16% | 5–11 | Tier 3 |
| Beis | 8% | 2–16% | 4–11 | Tier 3 |
| SwissGear | 6% | 1–15% | 6–11 | Tier 3 |
How to read this
- Choice share: how often models pick a brand when it appears in a shortlist of 4. Chance is 25%, the dashed line.
- The band is the 95% interval; the bright tick is the estimate. Overlapping bands are not a strict order.
- Tiers are published: a tier groups brands not distinguishable from that tier's leader. Same tier does not mean equal.
- Rank shows the plausible rank range, not a strict place.
- Drag across the chart to probe a share and see which intervals contain it.
- Brand names only: the models saw each option as a brand name, with no product facts, and answered from their own knowledge.
- Fast panel: the fast or small current models of each vendor, not the full flagship panel.
- Beta: intervals are not yet small-sample calibrated.
- Each page shows the latest edition. Dates are in the downloadable JSON.
Panel and conditions
Each edition puts the brands of the category to a panel of AI models, called through their APIs, in randomized shortlists of 4 (chance is 25%). Each option was a brand name only, with no product facts, prices or any commercial data, so a brand's share measures which brand the models recommend from their own knowledge for the shopper needs of the scenarios. Shares come with 95% intervals; tiers and rank intervals are simultaneous at the same level.
- anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5 @ claude-haiku-5.5 via OpenRouter (20%)
- openai/gpt-6-luna @ gpt-6-luna via OpenRouter (20%)
- google/gemini-4-argon @ gemini-4-argon via OpenRouter (20%)
- mistralai/mistral-large-4-0 @ mistral-large-4-0 via OpenRouter (20%)
- deepseek/deepseek-v4.1-flash @ deepseek-v4.1-flash via OpenRouter (20%)
Conditions: closed-book API calls via OpenRouter (pinned providers); web search, grounding, tools and retrieval off; forced choice; 2 paraphrases per scenario in English.
Methodology: ACM-1.0-chart-draft (draft rules for movement, significance and events, awaiting review).